Court stops ARCON from imposing N60bn fine on Facebook

A federal high court in Lagos has granted an interim order restraining the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria (ARCON) or its agents from demanding N60 billion from Facebook Nigeria over an alleged violation.

 

Yellim Bogoro, the presiding judge, issued the order in suit FHC/L/CS/2205/2024, following a November 29, 2024, motion ex-parte application filed by Facebook through its counsel, Mofesomo Tayo-Oyetibo.

 

“I have considered the ex parte application made, the reliefs sought particularly relief number two of the ex parte application, the affidavit in support, the facts deposed thereto in the affidavit,” Bogoro said.

 

“I find merit in the application. I shall grant the reliefs in part. I make this Order.

 

“It is hereby ordered as follows: That an Interim order of Injunction is hereby made pending the determination of the motion on notice herein filed for interlocutory injunction restraining the defendant whether by itself or through its officers, agents, servants and any other person acting under its authority from enforcing or further enforcing in any manner whatsoever the notice of violation/demand for compliance dated 21 October 2024 issued by the defendant to the applicant.

 

“I strongly feel the second relief sought is subsumed in the first relief.” Bogoro, therefore, adjourned the matter to February 20, 2025, for a hearing.

 

Facebook had sought two reliefs, with the first being an interim order of injunction, pending the determination of the motion on notice for interlocutory injunction, restraining the defendant, “whether by itself or through any person acting under its authority from enforcing or further enforcing in any manner whatsoever the Notice of Violation/Demand for Compliance dated 21st October 2024 issued by the Defendant to the applicant.”

 

The second relief sought an interim order of injunction restraining ARCON, whether by itself or through its prosecutors or anyone acting under its authority, “from instituting or commencing criminal proceedings in the Advertising Offences Tribunal to prosecute the Applicant, its officers, agents or representatives, with respect to the allegations and/or decisions made by the Defendant and/or subject matter of the Notice of Violation/Demand for Compliance dated 21st October 2024 issued by the Defendant to the Applicant.”

 

In seeking relief, the applicant filed 11 grounds for the application.

 

The microblogging company had said ARCON issued it a notice of violation and demand for compliance dated October 21, 2024, making certain allegations and decisions against Facebook, including imposing the N60 billion fine.

 

However, Facebook challenged “the constitutionality of the ARCON Notice based on grounds of denial of fair hearing, its unlawfulness under the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria Act 2022 (ARCON Act) and as an ultra vires act of the Defendant.”

 

“The defendant threatened that it will enforce the ARCON Notice against the Applicant by criminal prosecution in the advertising offences tribunal if the Applicant does not satisfy its demands,” the application reads.

 

“The applicant issued a statutory pre-action notice demanding the Defendant to withdraw the threat of enforcement, yet the Defendant has not done so.

 

“Order Vill Rule I of the Advertising Offences Tribunal Practice Direction mandates that a hearing in the Tribunal must be completed within 180 days of filing the charge.

 

“Section 306 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015, which applies in the Tribunal, prohibits the grant of an order for a stay of proceedings in a criminal matter.

 

“The Defendant appoints the prosecutor in the Tribunal, while the Chairman and other members of the Tribunal were appointed on the recommendation of the defendant.”

 

Facebook also said it would be vexatious and oppressive to the applicant and unconscionable for the defendant to initiate criminal proceedings against the applicant based on the allegations and decisions made by the defendant in the notice. Also, the applicant’s suit challenging the constitutionality and legality of the ARCON Notice is pending in the court.

 

On July 19, a federal high court in Abuja struck out a suit filed by the ARCON against Meta Platforms Incorporated, owners of Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp social media channels.

 

In October 2022, ARCON sued Meta and its agent, AT3 Resources Limited, for showing unapproved advertisements to the Nigerian audience.