Wednesday , January 19 2022
Alleged N7.1bn fraud: Kalu asks court to remove name from charge

Alleged N7.1bn fraud: Kalu asks court to remove name from charge


Kalu submitted that having been freed, there was no reason for his name to continue to appear on the charge hence his application to the court to formally strike out his name from the charge sheet.


The former governor also asked the court to make an order for the EFCC to unfreeze his bank account.


Similarly, Mr Chris Uche, (SAN), counsel representing Kalu’s company, Slok Nigeria Ltd. also filed an application seeking an order of court to remove the name of the company from the charge.


At the resumed hearing on Tuesday, Mr Solo Akuma, counsel to Mr Ude Udeogu, Kalu’s co-defendant told the court that the business of the day was to hear the case of his client who was in court and ready to proceed with his case.


The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) recalls that the court had ordered the retrial of Udeogu and fixed Jan. 11 but the matter as well as hearing of all pending applications could not go on.


Uche informed the court that the EFCC’s counsel, Mr Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), served his response to their application which they served on him since October 2021, on Jan. 10 and they needed time to respond.


The prosecutor, for his part, told the court that he had filed an application seeking a transfer of the case to the Lagos division.


Consequently, with consensus of counsel, the judge, Justice Inyang Ekwo adjourned the matter until March 10, for hearing of Kalu and Slok’s applications as well as EFCC’s motion on notice seeking transfer of the matter to Lagos.


Justice Ekwo had on Sept. 29, 2021, stopped the EFCC from retrying Kalu, over alleged N7.1 billion fraud.


Kalu was charged alongside his firm, Slok and Udeogu, and while the duo were convicted and sentenced for 12 years, the company was wound up.


However, in a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court declared the conviction null and void.


The apex court explained that the declaration was on the ground that Justice Mohammed Idris who delivered the judgment at the trial court was already a justice of the Court of Appeal at the time he delivered the judgement.


Following an attempt by the EFCC to retry Kalu, the former governor approached the court to challenge the decision.


The former governor argued that allowing the EFCC to try him afresh on the charge and same facts upon which he was earlier convicted and sentenced on Dec. 5, 2019, would occasion him to suffer a double jeopardy.


The court, in its ruling, opined that since Kalu was not mentioned in the judgment of the Supreme Court, which had nullified his conviction and sentencing and ordered a retrial, the judgment did not apply to him.


The judge reasoned that it was only Udeogu that could be retried as only his name was mentioned in the Supreme Court judgment.

About admin

Check Also

Putin and Raisi back closer ties in Kremlin meeting

Putin and Raisi back closer ties in Kremlin meeting

Tehran, Iran – Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin have expressed …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.