Bercow insists Johnson must obey law and ask for Brexit extension – as it happened

Not obeying the regulation should absolutely be a non-starter. Interval. Certainly, in 2019, in trendy Britain, in a parliamentary democracy, we – parliamentarians, legislators – can’t in all conscience be conducting a debate as as to whether adherence to the regulation is or isn’t required.

What conceivable ethical pressure do the general public’s elected representatives have in searching for to sort out delinquent behaviour, in prosecuting with better vigour and creativeness and relentlessness the combat towards knife crime, in arguing that the state should defend itself towards all types of nefarious illegality, if we’re to deal with for a second with the proposition that it is likely to be so as, within the identify of some greater trigger, to ignore a regulation enacted by parliament?

It’s astonishing that anybody has even entertained the notion … It could be essentially the most horrible instance to set to the remainder of society.

One ought to no extra refuse to request an extension of article 50 due to what one may regard because the noble finish of departing from the EU as quickly as doable than one may probably excuse robbing a financial institution on the premise that the money stolen could be donated to a charitable trigger instantly afterwards.