Epstein files with claims against Trump released by US Justice Department | Donald Trump News
Justice Department Releases Additional Epstein-Related Documents
On March 6, 2026, the United States Department of Justice released new documents from the FBI detailing interviews with a woman who has accused President Donald Trump of sexual assault during her teenage years. The woman, who is not named, alleges that she was introduced to Trump by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and claims the incident occurred when she was between the ages of 13 and 15.
The documents, which had not been previously disclosed during earlier mandated releases related to Epstein, were reclassified after being mistakenly labeled as “duplicative,” the Justice Department reported on Thursday.
According to the released documents, the woman described multiple interviews conducted by the FBI in 2019. During these interviews, she alleged that Epstein took her to either New York or New Jersey, where she met Trump. She recounted a specific incident in which she bit Trump in an attempt to resist his advances as he allegedly tried to coerce her into performing oral sex.
The woman also stated that she and her associates received threatening phone calls over the years, which she believed were aimed at pressuring her to remain silent about the incidents involving Epstein.
FBI records indicate that interviews with the woman ceased in 2019. At the time of their last interaction in October 2019, agents inquired whether she would be willing to provide additional information. Her response, as documented, questioned the value of further disclosures given the belief that no action would be taken against Trump.
In a response to the allegations, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt labeled the claims “completely baseless accusations, backed by zero credible evidence.” Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing regarding the allegations connected to Epstein. The Justice Department has characterized some of the claims in the released documents as “untrue and sensationalist.”
The timing of these disclosures coincides with escalating military actions in Iran, prompting renewed discussions on the significance of the Epstein files amid broader geopolitical conflicts. Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, who advocated for the passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, noted that military actions overseas will not eliminate the scrutiny surrounding the Epstein case.
Shaiel Ben-Ephraim, an analyst with Atlas Global Strategies, commented on the situation, suggesting that Trump’s focus on foreign conflict could serve as a distraction from domestic controversies. He observed a notable decline in public interest regarding the Epstein files since military developments began.
As investigations continue, political scrutiny remains on the Trump administration’s handling of Epstein-related documents and the broader implications of these allegations.
