Gaza’s daily nightmare vs US talk of AI-driven smart cities | Donald Trump
In a stark analysis by Sharif Abdel Kouddous, the ongoing plight of Gazans is explored amidst the backdrop of U.S. promises of “peace, stability, and opportunity.” Rather than fostering genuine improvement in the lives of the two million people in Gaza, U.S. plans are depicted as a “theme park of dispossession,” suggesting that the intended measures are more about control and surveillance than about building a better future for the population.
Abdel Kouddous critiques the framework laid out for the residents of Gaza, describing it as an Orwellian system filled with bureaucratic red tape and invasive biometrics. This approach portrays Gaza as a “lab for government surveillance,” designed to not only monitor but also to manipulate and ultimately displace its inhabitants. The author emphasizes that these plans serve to drive Palestinians out, reinforcing existing struggles rather than alleviating them.
He underscores the complexity and depth of the circumstances they are facing, marked by relentless Israeli bombings. While the U.S. presents its initiatives as pathways to peace, the reality on the ground reveals a fraught and deteriorating situation. Abdel Kouddous highlights the historical context, pointing out that Israel has consistently failed to advance beyond initial phases of ceasefire agreements with Arab nations. This history of non-compliance suggests that existing Israeli military strategies are focused on establishing permanent positions within Gaza — evidenced by the establishment of approximately fifty military bases.
Furthermore, Abdel Kouddous warns that this ongoing militarization of Gaza serves to create new “facts on the ground,” which can further entrench Israeli control and diminish the prospects for a peaceful resolution or a viable state for Palestinians. The systemic nature of these issues highlights a grim status quo where the aspirations for genuine peace remain unfulfilled, overshadowed by ongoing conflicts and tactical maneuvers.
In conclusion, as Gazans endure daily hardships exacerbated by military actions, U.S. assertions of bringing peace and opportunity appear hollow against the backdrop of proposed policies that prioritize surveillance and control over humanitarian needs. The situation, as articulated by Kouddous, reflects a deeply ingrained cycle of dispossession and oppression, raising critical questions about the future of Gaza and the genuine intentions behind global diplomatic efforts.
