Amazon workers reject union bid at second Staten Island warehouse

Amazon warehouse workers overwhelmingly rejected a union bid on Monday, dealing a blow to organizers who last month pulled off the first successful US organizing effort in the retail giant’s history.

This time around, warehouse workers cast 618 votes or about 62% against the union, giving Amazon enough support to fend off a second labor win as the tech giant continues to try and overturn its first loss.

According to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which oversees the process, 380 workers or 38% voted in favor of the grassroots union. Turnout was about 61%, with about 1,600 workers were eligible to vote, according to a voter list provided by Amazon.

The few ballots that were challenged by either Amazon or the Amazon Labor Union (ALU) were not enough to sway the outcome. Both parties may file objections to the election by next Monday.

On Twitter ALU said it would continue to organize at the facility “and beyond”.

The count has finished. The election has concluded without the union being recognized at LDJ5—sortation center on Staten Island. The organizing will continue at this facility and beyond. The fight has just begun. #ALU

— Amazon Labor Union (@amazonlabor) May 2, 2022

A separate election held last month gave a nascent group of organizers at ALU a surprise victory when workers at a different Staten Island facility voted in favor of unionizing. That was a first for Amazon in the US and a second labor win was expected to fuel more organizing at the nation’s second largest employer, and cement the power and influence of the ALU.

Senator Bernie Sanders and progressive congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez rallied in Staten Island ahead of the vote to encourage workers to organize. The vote came as other large US employers, including Starbucks, are facing a wave of union organizing.

But despite the momentum following the group’s prior win, it was unclear if it could replicate its success.

Organizers said they had lost some support at the warehouse after filing for an election in February because they directed more energy to the nearby facility that voted to unionize last month. There were also fewer organizers who worked in this facility – roughly 10, compared to the nearly 30 employed at the other warehouse.

The same obstacles that plagued the effort the first time, including Amazon‘s aggressive anti-union tactics, were at play again. In the lead-up to the election, Amazon continued to hold mandatory meetings to persuade its workers to reject the union effort, posted anti-union flyers and launched a website urging workers to “vote NO”.

“Right now, the ALU is trying to come between our relationship with you,” a post on the website reads. “They think they can do a better job advocating for you than you are doing for yourself.”

Amazon spokesperson Kelly Nantel had said in a statement its employees choice whether or not they want to join a union. But “as a company, we don’t think unions are the best answer for our employees,” Nantel said. “Our focus remains on working directly with our team to continue making Amazon a great place to work.”

Regardless of the Monday’s outcome, it was bound to be a tough road ahead for the ALU. Amazon has disputed the first election, arguing in a filing with the NLRB that the vote was tainted by organizers and by the board’s regional office in Brooklyn that oversaw the election. The company says it wants a redo election, but pro-union experts believe it’s an effort to delay contract negotiations and potentially blunt some of the organizing momentum. A separate NLRB regional office in the south-west will hold a hearing later this month over the company’s objections.

Meanwhile, the final outcome of a separate union election in Bessemer, Alabama, is still up in the air with 416 outstanding challenged ballots hanging in the balance. Hearings to review those ballots are expected to begin in the coming weeks.

Associated Press contributed to this article



Check Also

The Guardian view on rising poverty levels: political attacks on the poor have produced penury | Editorial

The Guardian view on rising poverty levels: political attacks on the poor have produced penury | Editorial

Poverty is a political choice – one that Conservative governments have much to answer for. …

Leave a Reply