Abuja court bars counsel from discussing Tinubu eligibility case on social media
A Federal High Court in Abuja has issued a warning to lawyers involved in a case contesting President Bola Tinubu’s eligibility for the 2027 presidential election. The court cautioned that discussions regarding the case should remain confined to the courtroom and not be held in the media or on social media platforms.
The warning came from Justice Inyang Ekwo on Tuesday as he adjourned the proceedings related to a lawsuit brought forth by former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar and the African Democratic Congress (ADC). The plaintiffs are seeking to disqualify Tinubu from the upcoming election, alleging that he submitted a forged National Youth Service Scheme (NYSC) certificate to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).
“This case is to be conducted in court and not in the media, whether it is regular or social,” Justice Ekwo stated. He further emphasized that if the case were to be discussed on social media, he would hold the responsible counsel accountable and take serious action.
The suit, identified as FHC/ABJ/CS/1888/2026, was filed against Tinubu, the All Progressives Congress (APC), and INEC. During the hearing, Omosanya Popoola appeared in court representing Tinubu.
Joseph Onu, counsel for Atiku, informed the court that the plaintiffs had not yet served the President with the necessary court documents. He requested that the documents be served directly to Tinubu or, alternatively, that the court allow for substituted service due to the significance of the case.
In response, Alex Iziyon, representing INEC, opposed the request for personal service, arguing that the presence of Tinubu’s lawyer demonstrated the President’s awareness of the litigation.
Iziyon also urged the court to expedite the proceedings, noting that more than 17 days had elapsed since the case was initiated. He indicated that INEC was prepared to submit its defense within ten days.
Justice Ekwo stated that he could not dictate how the plaintiffs should manage their case. The judge subsequently adjourned the matter until September 28 for further mention.
