Why some Nigerian judges escape punishment despite petitions – Ex-Supreme Court Justice, Mary Odili
Former Justice Odili Discusses Challenges in Judicial Accountability
UMUAHIA, Nigeria — Retired Supreme Court Justice Mary Odili emphasized the need for concrete evidence in petitions against judges, asserting that the lack of such evidence allows many judges to evade accountability.
Speaking at the South East Regional Security Summit organized by the Federal Ministry of Defense, Odili noted that the National Judicial Council (NJC) requires solid material facts to substantiate any allegations before taking action against a judge.
“A lot of concerns have been expressed in society about the state of justice,” Odili said. She encouraged individuals who are dissatisfied with judicial decisions to submit their complaints to the NJC, but warned that those petitions must be accompanied by credible evidence.
“The Chief Justice of Nigeria addresses every petition against judicial officers,” she stated. “However, many submissions lack the necessary factual support required for proper evaluation and action.”
Odili further highlighted the importance of a fair hearing for accused judges, explaining that without sufficient evidence, the alleged infractor could easily defend themselves against unfounded accusations.
“Once your petitions are verified and contain the necessary credibility, the implicated judge will face appropriate consequences,” she added.
Odili reassured Nigerians that the judiciary remains committed to ensuring justice, peace, and security across the nation.
